| Albert
Schweitzer in Britain |
When
Schweitzer had recovered his health after World War One, and gained some
funds from the sale of his books about Africa, he embarked on a tour of
European countries, lecturing and playing the organ to raise enough money
to go back to Lambarene. Wherever he went he set up committees to continue
to fund the hospital.
In 1922 he came to Britain and visited Oxford, Cambridge, Birmingham
and London. In 1907 Britain had been the first country to recognise the
importance of his radical new theological ideas, and both Oxford and Cambridge
had been in a furor about them.
When he went back to Africa in 1925, the British Hospital Fund Committee
started to publish regular bulletins about the progress of the hospital.
These bulletins are available as research material from the British Hospital
Fund, which is now based at Kenwood Cottage, Croydon, nr. Royston, Herts
SH8 0DR, tel: 01223 207333.
At that time Schweitzer was seriously thinking of starting a second hospital
at Nyasoso, in the British part of the Cameroons. The British government
offered full support. A long fund-raising letter to The Times from the
Schweitzer Hospital Fund Committee (which included four bishops!) describes
it as "a feasible project. The project fell through simply
for lack of time, when it was realised how much still had to be done in
Lambarene.
In 1928 Schweitzer was again in Britain on another lecture and recital
tour. The impact of his presence was described as a veritable tornado
with a riot of people surging round him; secretaries with their
typewriters relegated to the bathroom and stairs; important and importunate
callers, with whom he had light-heartedly made appointments and had forgotten
all about, demanding interviews, their indignation melting, when admitted
eventually, like wax in the sun. And when before his departure,
itself an uproarious occasion, Miss Royden tried to express in halting
French their gratitude for his visit and the honour that she
and her household felt in entertaining him as their guest, the Doctor,
gravely shocked, drew her aside and besought her never to use such a word
as that, parce que ce n'est pas convenable parmi les chrétiens.
Another encounter: So moved was Mr. Hudson Shaw by an address on
Lambarene given by the doctor to a meeting of which he was chairman that,
without a thought, he cast his gold watch into the collection. Remembering
later that the watch, precious though it was to him, was of old-fashioned
make and probably worth not more than the value of its gold, he offered
to "ransom" it for a much larger sum. Somewhat to his surprise,
Dr. Schweitzer asked if he might keep the watch for a few days longer.
It was soon returned, but this time with an inscription: Rev. Hudson
Shaw et Dr Albert Schweitzer fratres. 21/5/28. The considerate
thoughtfulness of this gesture was noted by Miss Royden as characteristic
of the "quality of perfection and I should add, of exquisite
care that gives a grace and fitness to all he says and does
trifles in themselves perhaps but not trifles to those to whom
beauty is as precious as strength.
In 1934 he gave the Hibbert Lectures in Oxford and the Gifford Lectures,
Edinburgh, also lecturing and/or playing the organ at Harrogate, Leeds,
Peterborough, Sheffield, Manchester, Birmingham, London.
Dr. Micklem of Selly Oak College, Birmingham wrote in his introduction
to the published lectures. "It is not easy to explain in words that
will not appear extravagant how greatly we were drawn to the man himself.
We knew he was strong, but we found him gentle; we have not often seen
such intellectual freedom coupled with so evangelical a zeal."
A
young journalist, Hubert le Peet, who later became editor of The Friend
and also of the British edition of Schweitzer's hospital bulletins, went
to Oxford to interview Schweitzer and found himself appropriated as his
guide in London. He wrote of those days as a strenuous time, conveying
the burly black-cloaked figure from theologian to theologian, from organ
to organ
He sometimes forgets that other people are not quite so
tireless as himself, and I've sometimes been quite sorry for dear Madame
Schweitzer!
From Edinburgh come two stories: One about Sir Wilfred Grenfell, who
had founded a hospital for fishermen in Labrador, doing in the frozen
wastes what Schweitzer was doing in the hot swamps of Africa. A mutual
friend invited them both and they met on the doorstep. "We began
at once," says Schweitzer, "to question each other about the
problems connected with the management of our hospitals. His chief trouble
was the disappearance of reindeer for their periodic migrations; mine
the loss of goats, from theft and snake-bites. Then we burst out laughing:
we were talking not as doctors concerned with patients, but as farmers
concerned with livestock!
When they signed the visitors' book the dark burly doctor from
the African river and the white-haired doctor from the snows Schweitzer
was impelled to add under his signature: "The Hippopotamus is delighted
to meet the Polar Bear."
And the great cellist, Pablo Casals, wrote in his autobiography, Joys
and Sorrows: I had looked forward eagerly to meeting Schweitzer.
Not only was I familiar with his writings on Bach, but I had of course
an intense admiration for him as a man. On that occasion in Edinburgh
there were a number of public and private concerts, and Schweitzer became
very excited over my playing of Bach. He urged me to stay on he
wanted to hear more Bach but I couldn't stay, because of other
engagements. I had to catch a train after my last performance, and I had
gotten my things together and was hurrying down a corridor when I heard
the sound of running footsteps behind me. I looked around. It was Schweitzer.
He was all out of breath. He looked at me with that wonderful expression
of his which mirrored the great compassion of the man. If you must
leave, he said, then let us at least say goodbye with intimacy.
He was speaking in French. "Let us tutoyer one another before we
separate. We embraced and parted.
From this time on the British Hospital Fund was among those trying to
get him the Nobel Peace Prize.
The Columbia Gramophone Company recorded Schweitzer's playing of a number
of Bach works in London for the Bach Organ Music Society. The organ he
had played on was that of All Hallows in the Tower. These first six works,
advertised as "played by Dr. Albert Schweitzer, the greatest interpreter
of Bach," proved so successful that in 1936 the company wished to
make fifty-two more records.
Though
he liked the organ at All Hallows Schweitzer had not been entirely happy
about the arrangements there. The rector had not been very enthusiastic
about the enterprise, and Schweitzer had been able to work there only
at nights. Moreover, much of the time he had spent on stepladders stuffing
the windows with cotton wool to prevent vibration. He proposed instead
the organ of St. Aurelie in Strasbourg an organ built by his favorite
organ builder, Silbermann, and restored by his friend Frederic Härpfer. The secretary of the Bach Organ Music Society went especially to Strasbourg to hear it and was so impressed by the organ's tone that Columbia agreed
to spend a great deal of money sending their recording equipment from
London to Strasbourg for what was at that time the "largest plan
of consecutive gramophone record making ever undertaken by an artist.
Jawaharlal Nehru was due to be released after one of his regular spells
in a British jail, and Mahatma Gandhi wrote to ask if Schweitzer would
look after him for a few days while he accustomed himself to freedom.
So Nehru was briefly the guest of the Schweitzers in Lausanne.
(back to top)
|